The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one Posts in the discussion thread "The BIG one" - An expecting Earthquake to hit California in the near future that could cause a HUGE difference on our planet. Mon, 09 Mar 2026 17:50:23 +0000 http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894#post-752347 Re: The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one#post-752347 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:31:37 +0000 Winters1 435139 I have seen this program they where sorta debunking it i think you where right Astrgeek.

]]> http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894#post-752194 Re: The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one#post-752194 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:54:38 +0000 Astrogeek 334222 As far as I know NatGeo has not pushed the 2012 doomsday. They had a program on recently debunking at least some aspects of it.

I could be wrong, however.

]]> http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894#post-752079 Re: The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one#post-752079 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:58:58 +0000 Laura Isn't National Geographic one of the channels who've been hawking the 2012 doomsday, and now they are acknowleding that we are gonna be around in 2037??????

]]> http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894#post-751951 Re: The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one#post-751951 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:35:01 +0000 Astrogeek 334222 Yep.

"New calculations reveal there is a 99.7 percent chance a magnitude 6.7 quake or larger will strike in the next 30 years."

That's pretty much a no-brainer. It's not particularly surprising or unexpected. We've had quite a long history of earthquakes in California.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/sca/ca_eqs.php

]]> http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894#post-751931 The BIG one http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-233894/the-big-one#post-751931 Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:15:10 +0000 Meg Saldana http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080414-AP-earthquake.html

]]>