<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Dr. Michio Kaku on Fox</title>
		<link>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736/dr-michio-kaku-on-fox</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Dr. Michio Kaku on Fox&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736#post-803960</guid>
				<title>Re: Dr. Michio Kaku on Fox</title>
				<link>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736/dr-michio-kaku-on-fox#post-803960</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Astrogeek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>334222</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>Frankly, I think you have way, WAY too many &quot;amateurs&quot; on your list of &quot;debunkers&quot; to be considered credible.</p> </blockquote> <p>Wow.</p> <p>OK, so let me get this straight&#8230; because I am an amateur astronomer, my arguments are not &quot;credible&quot;? So if I point out that somebody's idea of a rogue planet (just to pick one) doesn't conform to known laws, that argument is not credible because I'm an amateur?</p> <p>You're kidding right?</p> <blockquote> <p>I invite you to go to YOUTUBE and type in &quot;Michio Kaku solar flares Fox tv&quot; and then tell me they're not worried.</p> </blockquote> <p>Seen it.</p> <blockquote> <p>If you don't know who Dr. Kaku is, just quit doing this site immediately because you have no idea what you are talking about.</p> </blockquote> <p>I know who Dr. Kaku is.</p> <blockquote> <p>Any credible astrophysicist, which Dr. Kaku is,</p> </blockquote> <p>Er&#8230; no. Dr. Kaku is not an astrophysicist. Dr. Kaku is a theoretical physicist who has specialized in string theory, and the co-founder of string field theory (a branch of string theory).<sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-135618-1" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >1</a></sup></p> <blockquote> <p>&#8230; is worried enough to make alternate plans and is coming out to say everyone else should too.</p> </blockquote> <p>I listened very carefully to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_TzIUlaQok" target="_blank">the interview on Fox News</a> and he did not say that.</p> <p>What he did say is that we should be planning <strong>now</strong> for a strong geomagnetic storm such as the Carrington event, so that we are not caught by surprise. This is just common sense. However, this much of the 'interview' is the host projecting his words onto the un-cited &quot;NASA Report&quot;, which I think must be <em>Severe Space Weather Events &#8212; Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report</em> published in 2008, and <a href="http://cart.nap.edu/cart/deliver.cgi?record_id=12507" target="_blank">available online for free</a>.</p> <p><strong>That</strong> report also details a worst-case scenario, and urges regulation to prepare for the next 'Carrington' event, but deals with hardening of power grids, communication servers, and satellites.</p> <blockquote> <p>Just because the gov't doesn't come out and say, &quot;Gee folks, um, we need to make sure we're all OK if everything goes down&quot; you can't assume it isn't being planned for and we're just being kept in the dark so that the wonderful capitalistic society to which we are all enslaved keeps ticking until the last possible moment.</p> </blockquote> <p>Uh&#8230;</p> <p>I don't think we say that.</p> <p>In fact, I'm positive we don't say that.</p> <p>As far as I know, we are <strong>not</strong> being &quot;kept in the dark&quot;&#8230; quite the opposite. NASA is saying that there's a long-term problem that we need to look at. They are <strong>not</strong> saying that this event will happen in 2012&#8230; that was the news anchor, who was obviously fumbling around for words during that broadcast. I doubt he knew what he was talking about. Dr. Kaku's statement was about the next solar maximum coming up, and at the time that this aired, the opinion was that we would have a stronger-than-normal solar max sometime around 2012. Now it appears that we will have a weaker-than-normal solar max sometime in 2013.</p> <blockquote> <p>My advice to you and your amateurs is to stop trying get everyone to not worry and spend that energy and actually educate people on how to get prepared because we will, eventually, have to deal with a natural disaster no matter where we live, and it may very well be planet wide.</p> </blockquote> <p>My advice to <strong>you</strong> is to actually read the site, and see what its position is, and then argue against <strong>that</strong> (if you feel so inclined) instead of against some straw-man construction of things we don't say.</p> <p>Let us be clear: The above referenced report paints a worst-case 'what if' scenario, and urges political leaders to begin preparing for this kind of event. There is no mention in the report of a specific time-line, and only mentions an upcoming &quot;interval of increased solar activity&quot;.</p> <div class="footnotes-footer"> <div class="title">Footnotes</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-135618-1"><a href="javascript:;" >1</a>. <a href="http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=5">http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=5</a></div> </div> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736#post-803562</guid>
				<title>Re: Dr. Michio Kaku on Fox</title>
				<link>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736/dr-michio-kaku-on-fox#post-803562</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TheGreatJuju</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>469590</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Frankly, I think you have way, WAY too many &quot;amateurs&quot; on your list of &quot;debunkers&quot; to be considered credible.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I think this is known as a &quot;non-argument.&quot;</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>I invite you to go to YOUTUBE and type in &quot;Michio Kaku solar flares Fox tv&quot; and then tell me they're not worried.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Who are &quot;they?&quot;</p> <p>That clip has been cited by hysterical woos for the better part of the last year. It also aired prior to the <a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/">revised NOAA/NASA prediction</a> of 2013, not 2012, and at the moment sunspot activity is projected to be below average. Also, you're criticizing the credibility of this site, yet your one and only source is Michio Kaku giving outdated opinions to a Faux News reporter. I think this is known as &quot;irony.&quot;</p> <p>The animations used during that interview are hilariously exaggerated. But heck, it's meant to suck viewers in, not inform them.</p> <p>Since you apparently think YouTube is a great reference, here's Dr. Kaku speaking on 2012:</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCPn6Tyqr7I">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCPn6Tyqr7I</a></p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>If you don't know who Dr. Kaku is, just quit doing this site immediately because you have no idea what you are talking about.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Argumentum ad hominem.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Any credible astrophysicist, which Dr. Kaku is, is worried enough to make alternate plans and is coming out to say everyone else should too.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>This isn't about preparations. This is about 2012 doomsday predictions. The <a href="http://www.2012hoax.org/solar-flares">Solar Flares</a> page on this very site says the following: <em>&quot;Should such an event occur today, there would be massive disruption in electrical grids, possibly long term. What is needed is to beef up our early warning system, and to stockpile spares of critical components. However, the report paints a worst-case scenario where no warning is given, and the electrical grid operators do not have time to take precautions.&quot;</em></p> <p>No scientist, including Kaku, has said people should run screaming for the hills.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>you can't assume it isn't being planned for and we're just being kept in the dark so that the wonderful capitalistic society to which we are all enslaved keeps ticking until the last possible moment.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>So this doesn't really have anything to do with facts or science, but is all about your rage against the machine?</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>My advice to you and your amateurs</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>You know, you haven't made an actual argument yet.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>&#8230;is to stop trying get everyone to not worry</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I don't have control over whether anyone worries, as several weeks of posting here has shown repeatedly. For every rational person trying to speak sense, there are a dozen doomsayers spewing confusion, misunderstandings and outright lies. I think you need to take your own advice.</p> <blockquote> <blockquote> <p>and spend that energy and actually educate people on how to get prepared because we will, eventually, have to deal with a natural disaster no matter where we live, and it may very well be planet wide.</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>Possibly, but there's no reason to believe such an event is any more imminent now than at any other time in history, nor does any such potential event have anything to do with 2012 hysteria. And 2012 hysteria is, after all, what this site exists to address. You didn't miss that, did you?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736#post-803532</guid>
				<title>Dr. Michio Kaku on Fox</title>
				<link>http://2012hoax.wikidot.com/forum/t-246736/dr-michio-kaku-on-fox#post-803532</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Naia Kelly</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Frankly, I think you have way, WAY too many &quot;amateurs&quot; on your list of &quot;debunkers&quot; to be considered credible. I invite you to go to YOUTUBE and type in &quot;Michio Kaku solar flares Fox tv&quot; and then tell me they're not worried. If you don't know who Dr. Kaku is, just quit doing this site immediately because you have no idea what you are talking about. Any credible astrophysicist, which Dr. Kaku is, is worried enough to make alternate plans and is coming out to say everyone else should too. Just because the gov't doesn't come out and say, &quot;Gee folks, um, we need to make sure we're all OK if everything goes down&quot; you can't assume it isn't being planned for and we're just being kept in the dark so that the wonderful capitalistic society to which we are all enslaved keeps ticking until the last possible moment. My advice to you and your amateurs is to stop trying get everyone to not worry and spend that energy and actually educate people on how to get prepared because we will, eventually, have to deal with a natural disaster no matter where we live, and it may very well be planet wide.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>