Regarding the threat: Threats of violence are never cool. However, in this case Ivan was responding to Moo's question about what he (Gorelik) wished to accomplish, and it was Moo who first introduced the whole "strap a bomb to her chest" thing.

As far as I can tell, this thread does not constitute a DMCA problem (which is a copyright thing).

I also don't think that it constitutes a 'terrorist threat'.

I consider myself a reasonable adult (which is an important legal standard, actually) and I don't think that Gorelik issued a threat.

So, for now, the thread will remain up, and administrators and moderators can still post to it, but everybody else is locked out.

I may elect to remove the entire thread later in the day, after I've had a chance to get some coffee and food into my system.

I just reported it to the FBI. Having read Gorelik's website, I'm afraid he really is crazy enough to do something dangerous, and the longer Gorelik's post stays up here, the more trouble Astrogeek could have.

It would be great if FBI arrested all CERN terrorists. That would save all of us. That would save the FBI too. Otherwise, physicists-terrorists can kill us all, including FBI.

Somebody wrote earlier:

Ivan Gorelik should be ignored like the tinfoil-hat-wearing net.kook that he is.

Go! Ignore and ban me and such as me.
Nobody must try to stop the CERN in their experiment with Earth’s explosion.
Do not fear to die. Perform your sacred mission; - bring your DNI to other stellar systems.

Actually, I >STRONGLY< suggest leaving the material here and to actually report it to the FBI. Let's enjoy nailing the coffin he just dug himself.

There's a problem with that, 'A Wise Reader' is correct, if certain material remains, it could provoke a DMCA take down of the site, even though Astro, nor anyone else here shares Gorelik's views, Astro is still responsible, and accountable for the posts on his forum, so if someone posts something that is slandering or harassing and it's reported, Astro can get the short-end of the stick by association and allowing it to remain in place for others to see the slander, etc. and even though it is helpful to show just how much of a lunatic this guy is, it's still harmful to the forum, especially the bombing part.

Anyway, He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named, you're free to go view PhysForum and see the math they launched at you. I don't really want to find links for you, because I have to read through your posts and that's just a headache waiting to happen.

As for you supposedly speaking to a Russian CERN Scientist who started getting all babble-headed on you, I question this.

1) I call bullshit.

2) If it were true, I bet you were hardly presenting yourself in a serious manner to thusly be taken seriously.

As for you not being allowed into Physics Institutes, gee. Maybe your lack of a Ph.D (One year of training to become a physics teacher =/= doctor in Physics) and questionable knowledge and practices, combined with your suggested terrorist attacks on CERN make individuals not want you around?

You claimed to have submitted your work, and it got shot down. Do you THINK for a moment that they went over it and laughed it off? I doubt they saw your name on it and trashed it. They likely didn't see anything to respond to, especially with your given hostile and insane nature when it comes to your work being torn into.

By all means, google your own conceited name. PhysForum is pretty high on the list with the thread where a number of Physicists there do your math for you and point out your errors. Granted you then try to justify your errors by making them right and the 'Normal Practice of Physics' wrong, or did we forget your activities a few months back?

You've been shown your work and it has been found wanting. I shall now quote Lord of the Rings for you.

Ahem.

"LEAVE NOW, AND NEVER COME BACK!"

Thank you.

"If you also want to save all of us, let we welcome some real physicist. Let's ask him to answer 10 my short physical questions. Let he answer under his real name. I think if CERN physicists are honest and responsible, then they will agree to answer my questions. Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist. Go! Welcome somebody of them. Let they prove that they are not the global terrorists."

Repetitive posts of the same exact sentences over time become spam, these actions are also slander and harassment which are illegal and can result in a DMCA Takedown of a website, or forum. Your assertion "Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist." can result in a Federal investigation, not of CERN, but of yourself and the website that you submitted the sentence to.
You are 52, but you have the common-intellect of a five year old.
Do show some common-intellect, common-courtesy and common-sense when utilizing any forum, as it is respectful to both site/forum owner and readers alike.

If you also want to save all of us, let we welcome some real physicist. Let's ask him to answer 10 my short physical questions. Let he answer under his real name.
I think if CERN physicists are honest and responsible, then they will agree to answer my questions. Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist.
Go! Welcome somebody of them. Let they prove that they are not the global terrorists.

Moo wrote:

But that's already been done, sir. Or do you honestly think PhysForum is controlled by CERN?

Please, show me their math. I saw only a diarrhea about my person and education. That has no any scientific validity.
Moo wrote:

Come now, you've already been shown your errors.

Please give me a more precise link with their math and logical deduction.

Do your own work. Submit your theories to any of the reputed Physics Institutes of the world. They can't ALL be controlled by CERN, right?

I visited Moscow city last year especially in order to speak with physicists. I was not permeat to enter into Physical Faculty of Moscow State University. But I was permeated to speak with Savrin, who is a coordinator of Russian mission at CERN. At first his responses were scientific, but when I asked about the crudest error, comparison with cosmic rays, Savrin did not give a direct answer, but started to speak verbal diarrhea, - “all is relative in this world” and other rabbish with the purpose to go out from the direct answer.
I phoned several times to Tkachev (one of the criminals, who had signed the LSAG-report). But every time I phoned him, his secretary had invented a successive lie about his absence.

I repeat your sentence:

Do your own work. Submit your theories to any of the reputed Physics Institutes of the world. They can't ALL be controlled by CERN, right?

I wrote letters to different other Universities (Dnepropetrovsk, Simpheropol…). I asked to collect a conference or something else. But I did not receive a response.
I wrote thousands of letters to physicists of CERN and out of CERN. I received only a couple of answers, where they again repeated the crudest error about cosmic rays.

I repeat your sentence:

Do your own work. Submit your theories to any of the reputed Physics Institutes of the world.

Submitted. But I did not receive any answer, containing math or logic arguments.

I repeat:
If you also want to save all of us, let we welcome some real physicist. Let's ask him to answer 10 my short physical questions. Let he answer under his real name. I think if CERN physicists are honest and responsible, then they will agree to answer my questions. Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist. Go! Welcome somebody of them. Let they prove that they are not the global terrorists.

Considering that you're 52, you're obviously not the brightest crayon in the box, if you were, you would know that "Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance" can be justly used as evidence for a planned attack.

In spite of your ignorant response to Failscience brutally calling you out, you have failed to touch on key notes of his or, her post..

"Theoretical"- Lacking practical application or actual existence

In other words, even you don't know anything for fact.

In spite of the personal attack, which honestly, I see the personal attack as justifiable, you utterly failed to respond to these key points, rather than responding to these key points, you continued to babble on about CERN like any other moron without vital evidence to support their claims.

Submit your theory to peer-review or, just shut the hell up.
You can not say that every scientist is in on a cover up, there are indeed scientists who would make it known that your claim has any validity to it, however since you also fail to submit your claim to peer-review, I'm forced to believe that you're simply full of hot air, at which point, you're not worth the time of day.

A note to Astro..
Ivan Gorelik's sentence

Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist.

is harmful material, in the format that it's worded, it sounds as if he's planning 'something' and that will most certainly throw up a red flag for this site and for Ivan himself.

Come now, you've already been shown your errors. And you're crying the whole "THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY CERN!" lie again.

Do your own work. Submit your theories to any of the reputed Physics Institutes of the world. They can't ALL be controlled by CERN, right?

In which case, Gorelik, you're full of shit and you're a pathetic excuse of a human.

How old are you? I am 52. Do you feel a pleasure then you name people by crude words. Are you mentally helthy?

If you also want to save all of us, let we welcome some real physicist. Let's ask him to answer 10 my short physical questions. Let he answer under his real name.

I think if CERN physicists are honest and responsible, then they will agree to answer my questions. Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist.

Go! Welcome somebody of them. Let they prove that they are not the global terrorists.

Why are you trying to destroy this girl, again? What do you have to gain?

No. I want to save her, to save myself, my children and my granddaughter (today, several hours ago, I become a grandfather!)

If you also want to save all of us, let we welcome some real physicist. Let's ask him to answer 10 my short physical questions. Let he answer under his real name.

I think if CERN physicists are honest and responsible, then they will agree to answer my questions. Otherwise, if that girl would bomb herself in front of LHC entrance, that will be in the responsibility of CERN criminal physicists, who are the global terrorist.

Go! Welcome somebody of them. Let they prove that they are not the global terrorists.

I, for one, will be happy to see you meet your own demise, while the rest of us live our lives.

"Magnetic hole, developed theoretically by me, was ignored and was unknown."

"Theoretical"- Lacking practical application or actual existence

In other words, even you don't know anything for fact.

In which case, Gorelik, you're full of shit and you're a pathetic excuse of a human.

"Magnetic Hole >THEORY<". You said it yourself. I'm putting spiffy arrows around the key word.

Do not state it as a fact now to try to scare the poor girl. You have nothing to gain from trying to invoke fear into someone who is already scared to heavy levels. What do you have to gain, if you think there is something to gain? Are you hoping she decides to be a Crusader, straps a bomb to her chest, and heads over to the LHC and dies for your idiocy?

What do you have to gain from any of this? You've already admitted that your scenario is a coinflip, at the very best.

"Magnetic hole, developed theoretically by me, was ignored and was unknown."

Please tell everyone that this is from your own definition of physics, and not the commonly used and accepted version by the rest of the world, sans maybe a few of your devote followers/whoever you ripped your math from.

And let's ignore CERN and the stupid forums you've posted on. Have you presented your theory to the various highly-renowned physics institutes across the globe?

No?

Why are you trying to destroy this girl, again? What do you have to gain?

I love repeating myself~!

Quote from ERIC E. JOHNSON's article //
Instead, the issue of LHC risk is one of low probabilities—risks such
as one in 5,000, one in 100,000, one in a million, or even lower. Thus, the
relevant question to ask is, would particle physicists tolerate a higher risk of
catastrophe from their experiments than the rest of humanity might?
The answer is quite obvious. Of course they might. And that answer is not
mere speculation. Physicists have actually published a hard number: Busza,
Jaffe, Sandweiss, and Wilczek regarded a one-in-5,000 risk of destroying Earth
as “comfortable.”682
End of quote//

But pay attention! Physicists of CERN do not know about magnetic hole and about the errors in LSAG-report because we were banned at forums and ignored by secretaries of authorities.

Ivan Gorelik should be ignored like the tinfoil-hat-wearing net.kook that he is.

And I was banned, ignored. Discovered errors were ignored. Magnetic hole, developed theoretically by me, was ignored and was unknown.

I know they wouldn't do anything to harm their families,

Their assessed risk to die is millions times smaller than the risk to lost their highly-paid job places. They do not know about magnetic holes and about crude errors in LSAG-report.

That is why, be ready to die. Physicist will create microscopic droplets of aggressive dangerous condensate. In 500-1000 days that will lead to Earth explosion, to suicidal reproduction act of Biosphere.
I wish to all you a happy flight to stars. Do not fear to die. Fulfill your sacred reproduction mission.

He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named, what happens if you're wrong? Will you make a public apology to CERN for your ceaseless efforts against them?

This is not "If nothing happens even if you're right about the risks." No, I'm not asking that. I am flatly asking you "What happens if you're wrong?"

What will you do if you're wrong?

You seem convinced that this >will< happen, when your 'math' suggests more a Coinflip Scenario. This is what bothers most people, likely. The fact your scenario is effectively a 'call it in the air!' thing is likely what makes people raise their eyebrow.

You were wrong before. Every time. With them boosting the power now to another insignificant level, you're up in full force again.

Hrm. Suspicious pattern. Well, who cares about that! You, answer question: What will you do if you're wrong?

The reportS were written by various people, including some CERN (but not LHC) scientists, but also some independent scientists not affiliated with CERN.

There are only two reports:
1. STUDY OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS EVENTS DURING HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS AT THE LHC: REPORT OF THE LHC SAFETY STUDY GROUP
written by 6 people in 2003: J.-P. Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P. Sonderegger, H.-J. Specht.
2. Review of the Safety of LHC Collisions, written by "LHC Safety Assessment Group" consisting of 5 physicists: John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor Tkachev and Urs Wiedemann.

These two reports are falsifications, invented especially in order to calm the world's crowd of people, who do not understand the physics.

These reports have crude errors and lie assertions.

Here is a quote from the article "THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF THE WORLD" written by ERIC E. JOHNSON:

p.858
quote
Much more blunt was renowned University of Manchester
physicist Brian Cox:
“Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world,” he said, “is a
twat.”356
J. The Best Answer
In August 2008, with the public opening of the LHC coming within weeks,
John Ellis gave a talk in the CERN auditorium in which he sought “to provide
the ammunition” that CERN people could use to convince others that the
collider poses no danger.357
After reviewing the scientific arguments that the LHC is safe, Ellis
explained that a question that worried him more than whether humanity was
safe from the LHC, was the opposite—whether the LHC was safe from
humanity.358
Ellis then briefed the audience on unfavorable press reports, the various
lawsuits filed to stop the LHC, and a public opinion poll indicating that most
people thought the LHC was not worth the risk.359 Ellis also introduced the
audience to Richard Posner, whom Ellis said he found “really worrying.”360
Wrapping up, Ellis came to what his presentations slides labeled “The Best
Answer.”361
“So, to finish,” Ellis said, “the way to stop all this argument about whether
the LHC is going to destroy the planet is to get the LHC working.”362
“Within a few weeks time, we will know that LSAG was right.”363
the end of quote-

Ivan Gorelik should be ignored like the tinfoil-hat-wearing net.kook that he is.

And me, Ivan Gorelik, was ignored and banned at almost all physical forums (Russian, English, French). My theory of magnetic hole was ignored. My discoveries about 4 crude errors in LSAG-report were ignored. Physicists of CERN did not know anything about these errors and about a magnetic hole.
Who had banned me?
Moderators of forums.
Who are moderators?
Most of them are computer specialists but they are not physicists. Some of them are physicists but they have an instruction from CERN to ban anyone, who tries to speak about danger of LHC.

Leaders of CERN demanded to say everywhere about the zero risk. So me and such as me were banned. This is the cause why the leaders of CERN do not know about magnetic hole and about the crudest errors of LSAG.

That is why, be ready to die. Physicist will create microscopic droplets of aggressive dangerous condensate. In 500-1000 days that will lead to Earth explosion, to suicidal reproduction act of Biosphere.
I wish to all you a happy flight to stars. Do not fear to die. Fulfill your sacred reproduction mission.

What are they going to do differently on 11/9/2010 that is differt from they are already doing?

11/9/2010 they begin to collide heavy ions. Probability of creation of dangerous condensates is about 10-100 times more. Creation of subnuclear condensate leads to the explosion of the Earth.

Is the LSAG report correct?

No. I found at least 4 crude errors in LSAG-report. No one real physicist had give a single contr-argument against my conclusions about the errors.

Have you looked at the site that Ivan referenced above? If not, please do so.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html

Be sure to read all of the hysterical accusations, the comparisons of his opponents to Hitler, etc. Think of a lunatic standing on the street corner, screaming at passersby, and you'll have a pretty good idea of Gorelik.

Especially, scroll down to the very bottom. You'll find an appeal for money. Take a look at how much he's received: $50 U.S. Whoopee. That's how miserably few people there are who believe anything he says.

It's advancement, love. We've done a pretty good job of only making a handful of things that could ultimately kill us, and that's only if their use is mistreated.

As it stands, I strongly doubt the LHC will do anything to us. But you never know, it could be turned into a DEATH RAY!

Seriously, the LHC is perfectly safe.

So I've heard… *ahem*

Ivan Gorelik should be ignored like the tinfoil-hat-wearing net.kook that he is.

We should trust this report and take what Gorelik says about them with a grain of salt????

There's no reason to doubt the safety report, and I wouldn't even waste salt on Ivan Gorelik.

Here, read this:

The safety of particle collisions at the Large Hadron Collider has been questioned in the media, on the Internet and through the courts. Particle physics experiments were ongoing as of March 2010 at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world's largest and most powerful particle accelerator, built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva, in Switzerland.[1][2] The claimed dangers of the LHC particle collisions, which began in November 2009, include doomsday scenarios involving the production of stable micro black holes and the creation of hypothetical particles called strangelets.[3]

To address such concerns, CERN mandated a group of independent scientists to review these scenarios. In a report issued in 2003, they concluded that, like current particle experiments such as the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), the LHC particle collisions pose no conceivable threat.[4] A second review of the evidence commissioned by CERN was released in 2008. The report, prepared by a group of physicists affiliated to CERN but not involved in the LHC experiments, reaffirmed the safety of the LHC collisions in light of further research conducted since the 2003 assessment.[5][6] It was reviewed and endorsed by a CERN committee of 20 external scientists and by the Executive Committee of the Division of Particles & Fields of the American Physical Society,[7][8] and was later published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Physics G by the UK Institute of Physics, which also endorsed its conclusions.[5][9] The report ruled out any doomsday scenario at the LHC: the physical conditions and events that will be created in the LHC experiments occur naturally in the universe without hazardous consequences.[5]

The LSAG report is the LSAG report… a safety report by an independent review body. I'm not qualified to judge it's correctness or not. But, neither is Ivan. I accept the report. I think they've covered their bases in reviewing the potential risks, and their arguments that the collider is safe are convincing to me.

According to Geryl,it's for building a survival center in the Sierra Nevada mountains. I'm not going fault anyone for that if they think the world is gonna end. I really think people like Geryl and Gorelik believe what they're saying. It doesn't make them right however.

Ivan, can you answer two questions for me?

1. What is Sanchos credentials in physics?

Sancho did understand that physicists can explode the Earth mach earlier than me. Sancho must be honored as one of the best reasonable physicists of the world.

Answer the question

From the article Interaction of strangelets with ordinary nuclei
L Paulucci and J E Horvath
arXiv:1003.4901v1 [nucl-th] 25 Mar 2010

The hypothesis of stability for strange quark matter (SQM) [1, 2, 3, 4], a cold form of
QCD plasma composed of u, d, and s quarks, naturally leads to the consideration of its
existence in the interior of neutron stars [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. It has been conjectured that if
this is indeed the case, then some astrophysical events could eject finite pieces of SQM,
called strangelets, in the Galaxy. Thus, the latter would “contaminate” the cosmic ray
flux in the interstellar medium (ISM), forming an exotic component among ordinary
nuclei (however, see [10, 11] for definite counterexamples from strange stars merging
simulations).
It has been suggested that strangelets of high baryon number lose mass in
successive interactions with ordinary nuclei from the top of the atmosphere during their
propagation towards the earth’s surface. When their baryon number reaches a value
for which their mass is lower than the minimum one associated with stability, A_crit,
they decay into ordinary hadrons.

…
Pay attention at the date of publication of this article.
And you will be able to find my old posts with the analogues logical conclusions about A_crit. But I used N_crit.

RickardM wrote: Strange matter and Strangelets are not in any way the same thing, yet you consistently make the mistake of mixing them up. Deliberately?

Read Wikipedia-aricle about "strange matter", "strangelets" and "strange stars". I've red it several times much earlier.

And I'll add: Dark matter can be made of one of the following condensates:
N(uds); strangelet or strange star.
N(uds)K(udd); strange/neutron mixture.
N(css); second-generation matter.
N(css)K(uds)L(udd); mixture of …
…
M_(N); magnetic hole.
…

Any of these matters can be aggressive and can ruin the ordinary matter if at certain N_crit it's mass will be less than the mass of usual nucleon.

Ivan, can you answer two questions for me?
1. What is Sanchos credentials in physics?

Sancho did understand that physicists can explode the Earth mach earlier than me. Sancho must be honored as one of the best reasonable physicists of the world.

2. How do you expect an Ice-9 scenario to be possible when Pauli exclusion would rule that out?

1. Ice-9 scenario has no explosive character, but the Earth can be exploded.
2. Pauli exclusion principle can be eliminated by pairing of constituent elements of a condensate. Not all condensates, mentioned above, can be denied by this exclusion principle.

They do not ruin relativity theory but go further. The most known persons from these group are: Otto Rössler http://lhc-concern.info/?page_id=91 , Walter Wagner http://lhcdefense.org/ , Luis Sancho, Raier Plaga.

Do not, under any circumstances, come here and claim that Sanchos claims correspond to anything that is even close to the standard model of physics (Neither does Wagners, but Sancho is even more far off). And you, well I'm not going to kick on someone that is already down… My sisters daughter, age 5 months, is able to produce more relevant physics than you and your complete list of crackpots can do all together.

And the funny thing is that only one of them have any credentials in anything close to particle physics. Shall we have a go at them? Otto Rössler - Biochemistry/Chaos theory, Walter L Wagner - Nuclear safety inspector/Botanist/Teacher (poor children), Luis Sancho - Philisopher/Theorist (without any credentials), Rainier Plaga - The only one with actual credentials in physics, and he was proven wrong by LSAG. Not all that impressive to be honest. Or well, compared to you either one of them has greater credentials, but that doesn't really mean much. Just because you scream the loudest doesn't make you right, you know?

As for the Russian scientists, haven't gone through them all but what I've found is that some of them work with string theory and quantum mechanics and doesn't even seem to be talking about LHC at all (just about 4D, so I guess that supports your theories, right?). I'm sorry but my Cyrillic is a little rusty, so I might have missed something here. If so, I'm sure you will be kind enough to point it out to me…

2. The second group of physicists are physicist-criminals. They were the first persons to understand about the danger of LHC but they say us now about of safety of LHC. This group includes even two Nobel Prize Winners. It seems they are ready to lie us about the safety of LHC collisions because they were bought by CERN.

Have you ever stopped and asked yourself this question: Wouldn't they be equally dead as us if the earth were destroyed? So what would they have to gain if this experiment were going to kill us with the probabilities you give? Would they have any use of the money CERN "bought" them for if they were dead?

So be ready to die. Presidents do not know about the danger of LHC. There is no the force, able to stop the global suicide.

…

I'm done with this (again), feel free to rant on as much as you like. It only help with proving our point (that you are indeed a really sick a**hole

RickardM: Because Ivan is the only person on earth that really understand physics

No. I am not the only person.

I would divide contemporary physical society at three groups:

1. Reasonable thinkers. This group can undergo any generally accepted idea to doubt. Persons of this group have their own vision on the world, according to their education, further work and selfeducation. This group is very large. The most of them are quite weak. They do not understand Special Relativity and try to invent Ether model of Universe. Some of this group is very strong. They do not ruin relativity theory but go further. The most known persons from these group are: Otto Rössler http://lhc-concern.info/?page_id=91 , Walter Wagner http://lhcdefense.org/ , Luis Sancho, Raier Plaga. The most known persons in Russian-language countries are: Vasiliy Golota http://n-t.ru/tp/ng/ps.htm , Vladimir Atsykovsky http://www.atsuk.dart.ru , Leonid Shirshov http://pereplet.sai.msu.ru/text/shirshov1.html , Evgenij Dovgel http://dovgel.com/kvv.htm . This non-completed list I would finished by my web-site http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
2. The second group of physicists are physicist-criminals. They were the first persons to understand about the danger of LHC but they say us now about of safety of LHC. This group includes even two Nobel Prize Winners. It seems they are ready to lie us about the safety of LHC collisions because they were bought by CERN.
3. The third group of physicists do not interested in the consequences of LHC. Persons of this group are unable to make scientific discoveries. Most of them even do not know the mass of a dangerous droplet/particle, which can be created at LHC. Most of them are good professors, repeating the texts, written in scientific articles and books; or they are good employees who are interested only in their narrow branch of science. This group is dangerous because they repeat and repeat for thousands times the crudest error of the LSAG about cosmic rays.

So be ready to die. Presidents do not know about the danger of LHC. There is no the force, able to stop the global suicide.

So, as you can see, the most of physicist do not have their proper brains, but repeat the words and errors of LSAG.

… Because Ivan is the only person on earth that really understand physics

So be ready to die. Presidents do not know about the danger of LHC. There is no the force, able to stop the global suicide.

As I said, you go first, then the rest of us can come after. It might be a while, but nevertheless….

You can read this my page: Crude errors in the LHC safety documents. What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil? http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html

This might sound rude Ivan, but I'll go ahead anyway; you seem very keen on pointing out that we "shouldn't be afraid of performing our sacred mission and start of to the stars", right?
My proposal is this; We'll give you a head start of two months (although I doubt you will see any stars in your afterlife), so feel free "to start of to the stars", ALONE.

I usually remain rather calm, but sick human beings such as yourself really makes me upset. How can one person find so much joy in scaring innocent people? Did you have a rough childhood by any chance? My guess is yes, and since I have at least twice as many credentials in psychology than what you have in physics I must be right. Or…?

That's more than 9 months ago. Please enlighten us as to the Prosecutor's reply.

A couple of month’s I left Moscow and moved home to Feodosia. My son had read me a response from the Prosecutors’ office of Russia. He said that my petition was sent to Russian Academy of Sciences.

Earlier, when I was in Moscow, I tried to investigate the paths of my earlier multiple letters, addressed to President and to Prosecutors office. I visited Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), found a man, who is responsible about the received mail. He said that my letters were sent to a Physics Division of RAS and he had give me a phone-number of a secretary. I phoned her and she told me that my letters were sent to the Section of Nuclear Physics and she give me a phone-number of the secretary. I phoned there and young secretary said me about LSAG-report and about we are safe according to LSAG. I tried to explain her about the errors, made in LSAG-report, but she was unable to understand and dropped a phone-tube. I suspect that she send responses to secretaries of President and Prosecutors office about the same, - about the existence of LSAG-report.

The only single response I received from Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences. They repeated about LSAG and added about ConCERNed. So, as you can see, the most of physicist do not have their proper brains, but repeat the words and errors of LSAG.

So be ready to die. Presidents do not know about the danger of LHC. There is no the force, able to stop the global suicide.

Rickand I must repeat the following especially for you: There were observed many events, like destruction of strangelets, created in collisions of cosmic particles and atmospheric particles. It is clear that a strangelet, created by cosmic and atmospheric protons, which have, for example, the rest energy about 1 TeV, must also have a kinetic energy about 1000 TeV. The last energy is much greater comparatively to the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, which is about 0.0001 TeV. That is why a strangelets, created in a "cosmo-atmospheric" particles, decay, making an unusual showers of secondary cosmic particles. But a strangelet, which can be created at collider, with the rest energy about 1 TeV, can not have the kinetic energy about 1000 TeV, but visa verse, - it can have the kinetic energy less than the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, - less than 0.0001 TeV. In this case it will not be overheated, it will not be exited, but it can capture the ordinary nuclei and transform them into it’s own strange nucleons (usd).

Crap, crap and crap. But then again, at least you are consistent in what you present. Could you give me a source for your claims that Strangelets has been observed in CR? As far as I know they are still only hypothetical (at best).

Strange matter and Strangelets are not in any way the same thing, yet you consistently make the mistake of mixing them up. Deliberately?

As for the arXiv article: "It is not ruled out that Centauro events may have their origin in strangelets, although these suggestive results are still to be analysed in further details." Is that your "proof" for their existence?

Perhaps you would like to point me in the right direction of what support you find in that article?

But the article of Luis Sancho is more truthful http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125

This should pretty much sum it all up. He links to (a) an arXiv article and (b) Luis Sanchos page, and his conclusion is that the latter is more truthful(!?)

Ivan, can you answer two questions for me?

1. What is Sanchos credentials in physics?

2. How do you expect an Ice-9 scenario to be possible when Pauli exclusion would rule that out?

You wrote:

Ask the President and Chief of a Prosecutors office of your country to stop colliders

And here we find:

December 2, 2009 I have delivered petition to the Prosecutor’s Office
of Russia.

That's more than 9 months ago. Please enlighten us as to the Prosecutor's reply.
What's the Russian for 'raspberry'?

Like Raymond Mardyk's before him, I think our friend Ivan has taken it upon himself to game search engines. That must be it, a publicity stunt, because he has yet to post a single word that makes sense.

Dear Laura, I have found several crude errors in the Safety documents of CERN and published them on my web-site and at some forums. There were no real contr-arguments from my opponents, but as it was many times earlier, they tried to prove me to be a fool because I am just a fool. But where are their math and logic? Did you see it? Give me a link.

You can read this my page:
Crude errors in the LHC safety documents. What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil? http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html

Rickand I must repeat the following especially for you:

There were observed many events, like destruction of strangelets, created in collisions of cosmic particles and atmospheric particles. It is clear that a strangelet, created by cosmic and atmospheric protons, which have, for example, the rest energy about 1 TeV, must also have a kinetic energy about 1000 TeV. The last energy is much greater comparatively to the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, which is about 0.0001 TeV. That is why a strangelets, created in a "cosmo-atmospheric" particles, decay, making an unusual showers of secondary cosmic particles. But a strangelet, which can be created at collider, with the rest energy about 1 TeV, can not have the kinetic energy about 1000 TeV, but visa verse, - it can have the kinetic energy less than the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, - less than 0.0001 TeV. In this case it will not be overheated, it will not be exited, but it can capture the ordinary nuclei and transform them into it’s own strange nucleons (usd).

Strange matter, which is N(uds), and which was theoretically investigated, is not the only possible dangerous matter, which can be created at powerful colliders. The others dangerous subnuclear condensates are: magnetic holes, consisting of bosons, smallest vacuum magnets; 2-d generation matter; mixtures of strange nucleons and neutrons; and so on. The energy of a single p-p or HI-HI collision at contemporary colliders is sufficient in order to create a dangerous droplet, consisting of 1000 of constituent elements. It is known: the more the number of elements in a droplet, - the more the probability that droplet would be stable and would be able to grow and ruin the ordinary matter.
In fact, physicists-suiciders at CERN are looking for such droplets in order to use them as the energy sources. They want to be the richest people of the planet. But they rather explode the Earth with those sources and will kill us all. That is why, all best physicist of the planet are the most dangerous terrorists, and that is why they all must be locked in prisons now. The 9-th of November can be the first day of Earth explosion. The duration of the explosion is about 500-1000 days. Is a 2012 year a coincidence?

Read for example an article: Interaction of strangelets with ordinary nuclei.
arXiv:1003.4901v1 [nucl-th] 25 Mar 2010

But the article of Luis Sancho is more truthful http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125

The title "Doctor Dark Energy" I take at the beginning of 2000-th, when I computed the temperature of background radiation in the Static/Stationary model of Universe. My result was 2.728 K. Observable value is 2.725 K.

Wow. Quite a stretch for you there, considering that COBE measured it as 2.725 in 1992!

That is why I myself take the title "Dr Dark Energy".

Jesica wrote: He has filed lawsuits against the LHC?
Walter Wagner, Luis Sancho, Otto Rössler and some other people indeed filled lawsuits against organizations, promoting the dangerous experiments at powerful collides, RHIC and LHC. Judges do not know the physics. They used the falsified information, widespread by criminal physicists, who make their money at those experiments.
Afaik, all lawsuits all over the world were rejected by judges.
As for me, I wrote several letters to presidents of different countries, to chiefs of prosecutors' offices and to some other authorities. I tried to organize protest meetings. But all were in vain. Secretaries believe the criminal physicists and throw out my letters into rubbish. Police believed the criminal physicists and demanded to stop the our protest meetings.

Have strangelets been proven, or are they theory?

There were observed many events, like destruction of strangelets, created in collisions of cosmic particles and atmospheric particles. It is clear that a strangelet, created by cosmic and atmospheric protons, which have, for example, the rest energy about 1 TeV, must also have a kinetic energy about 1000 TeV. The last energy is much greater comparatively to the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, which is about 0.0001 TeV. That is why a strangelets, created in a "cosmo-atmospheric" particles, decay, making an unusual showers of secondary cosmic particles. But a strangelet, which can be created at collider, with the rest energy about 1 TeV, can not have the kinetic energy about 1000 TeV, but visa verse, - it can have the kinetic energy less than the binding energy of constituent element of the strangelet, - less than 0.0001 TeV. In this case it will not be overheated, it will not be exited, but it can capture the ordinary nuclei and transform them into it’s own strange nucleons (usd).

Strange matter, which is N(uds), and which was theoretically investigated, is not the only possible dangerous matter, which can be created at powerful colliders. The others dangerous subnuclear condensates are: magnetic holes, consisting of bosons, smallest vacuum magnets; 2-d generation matter; mixtures of strange nucleons and neutrons; and so on. The energy of a single p-p or HI-HI collision at contemporary colliders is sufficient in order to create a dangerous droplet, consisting of 1000 of constituent elements. It is known: the more the number of elements in a droplet, - the more the probability that droplet would be stable and would be able to grow and ruin the ordinary matter.
In fact, physicists-suiciders at CERN are looking for such droplets in order to use them as the energy sources. They want to be the richest people of the planet. But they rather explode the Earth with those sources and will kill us all. That is why, all best physicist of the planet are the most dangerous terrorists, and that is why they all must be locked in prisons now. The 9-th of November can be the first day of Earth explosion. The duration of the explosion is about 500-1000 days. Is a 2012 year a coincidence?

Read for example an article: Interaction of strangelets with ordinary nuclei.
arXiv:1003.4901v1 [nucl-th] 25 Mar 2010

But the article of Luis Sancho is more truthful http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125

This is Gorelik's "CV" from his website:

The citizen of Russia. Now live in Ukraine. Nationality: Ukrainian.
Was born the third of January 1958 in the Nikopol town, Ukraine, USSR.
1965-1973 - Elementary School.
1973-1977 - Nikopol Agricultural School; specialty — agricultural mechanization.
1977-1979 - Army.
1980 entered into Dnepropetrovsk State University, and in
1981 moved into Moscow State Correspondence Pedagogical Institute and begin to work as physics teacher.
1985 finished the Institute and received the profession of physics teacher.
1992 (after the USSR was disintegrated) dropped teaching and worked in small commerce.
1998 - 2004 did not work anywhere, build my house, and spend all my time with my theory, Space Genetics.
2004 - 2007 worked at the secondary school as a physics and astronomy teacher.
2008 till now spend all my time to stop and ban the dangerous scientific experiments, such as particle collisions in powerful colliders.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/62f9af4e91b77673?hl=en#
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/41917 (scroll down to the comments)
http://www.thescienceforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=214932&highlight=#214932
http://www.thescienceforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=205402&highlight=#205402 (he's been banned there apparently)

Gorelik has invented several new theories, including "space genetics", the "arc effect" which apparently overturns our current ideas of stellar fusion, and a 1-meter diameter nuclear fusion reactor.