I'm not sure who to believe.
Ideally, you should believe who provides the best evidence. In the case of 2012, doomsayers don't provide any coherent evidence at all, so they should be immediately suspect.
Are you just saying it's a hoax because…. I don't know.
It's a hoax because effectively impossible to highly unlikely claims are being made in the complete absence of evidence, or worse, being made on the basis of pseudoscience and outright lies. Many such claims are addressed in detail on this site. Just select a topic from the menu at the left.
But people have been saying the government are hiding things from us???
People are always saying something. That doesn't mean it's true. "The government is hiding something from us," is not a particularly remarkable claim. Governments are inherently and inescapably elitist, and in general probably hide lots of things from their subjects, just like any other exclusive club. If you specifically believe the government is hiding something about 2012, that raises a number of questions. Why? What could they hide? How would they go about suppressing such information? What about all the 2012 claims that have been utterly refuted? Is there any evidence whatsoever that something about a 2012 doomsday is being deliberately concealed by a government or some other group? If so, what is this evidence? If not, doesn't that qualify as fiction?
What's the getting blown to bits by asteroids?
We aren't getting "blown to bits by asteroids," at least not in 2012. Even if the earth were hit by a large asteroid, it would not be "blown to bits." The next major near-earth approach isn't until 2036, and even then only if the object's orbit carries it on a particular path a few years before that. In any case, the impact probability is very low. If you will provide a specific reference to the asteroid claim, I'm sure it can be easily refuted.
I don't like this at all.
Hey, what's not to like? The doomsayers are wrong. ;)
