Those "messages" read like newspaper horoscopes. Seriously, are you serious?
Here's the October 2010 "prediction":
Humanity is going on the path of self´destruction that people have prepared with their own hands. A great suffering will come for those who live in Italy. Something similar will come to those who live in Chile. The ground will be shaken and people will live in a time of great suffering.
Considering that Chile rests on the Ring of Fire where the Nazca plate collides with South America, "predicting" that the ground will shake in Chile is kind of like "predicting" that it will rain next month somewhere on the Aleutian Islands. Moreover, ascribing the "prediction" above to an earthquake (ad hoc, after the fact, mind you) doesn't really make sense, in that the lead-in refers to "the path of [self] destruction," then states that something "similar will come to those who live in Chile." I don't think the people of Chile caused their own earthquake, though I suppose you can always claim that God did it, along the lines of Pat Robertson's proclamation about Haiti after that quake.
Furthermore, this region along the Peru-Chile trench has been an area of concern for years.
Here's the "prediction" from January 2010:
Great suffering will come for the inhabitants of Chile. Similar suffering also will come for those who dwell in Lisbon.
I didn't think it could get more vague, but apparently it can. Any proposition along the lines of "Great suffering will come to the inhabitants of Country X," has a reasonable likelihood of being applicable at some point in the future, especially when the date is left wide open so believers can fill in the blank later.
What I find utterly pathetic about this is that the Chile quake killed around 521 people, whereas the Haiti quake killed a minimum of 90,000, with higher estimates reaching over 200,000. Why didn't this person's magical connection to the future result in any recent mention of the Haiti disaster? Mysterious ways, I guess.
She also predicted the Gulf disaster
Maybe you should just provide the reference instead of expecting others to track every vague statement down.
and has had a number of other hits as well.
"Hits?" Yeah, that's pretty much what it is — fire in the dark and remain as vague as possible. Once in a while, you'll find the mark, and your followers will fawn in awe. Psychics, astrologists and self-styled prophets have been at it for thousands of years. If you consider a "hit" to be any vague remark that can be later attached to some event, I'm afraid you're thinking wishfully.
She is predicting a pole shift and severe cataclysmic changes
She is welcome to "predict" whatever she likes. The facts of the matter don't change.
Religious people have been predicting doom for as long as there have been religions. They're almost always wrong. When they are "right," it's invariably something unspecific attached ad hoc or something so likely to occur as to preclude any actual prediction.
Douglas Gray (guest) 25 Jun 2010 22:29
