Im atheist and my reasons for this are why is there so much pain in the world why is there people going hungry and dying of starvation.and another one of my reasons is this :If Priests are supposedly God's messengers why do priests sexually abuse little boys and girls??
what i want to know is, if your atheist give me your reasons
wow sorry no need to get fussy its only a comment its not like its forbidden to be written here jeesh
Well, actually it is off topic. I'll move it to that group. Feel free to continue the conversation there.
"Do you ever think about things you do think about?" - Henry Drummond to Matthew Harrison Brady in Inherit the Wind
As an Atheist I'm actually struggling to see your point Rory.
If you're just asking "If you are an Atheist, why are you an Atheist?" my only answer is "I wasn't brought up to believe in a God", nothing more to it than that.
I wasn't brought up to believe in God, either. But I ultimately chose to become Atheist on grounds other than 'Why does God let people suffer?'
In support of those of faith, my answer for that is simply that we are left to endure the hardships we bring upon ourselves. To suffer from forces beyond our control would likely invoke an Act of God, if anything. But for a crisis we inflict upon ourselves, or do not prepare for, or are an act of the Earth? God shall not lift a finger, but to pen those in who have died.
To justify your atheism based on the world around you, or on things such as 'priests molesting children', is not a solid justification, in my opinion. Especially the latter one. There are sick, evil people in all roles of the world, not simply those of the cloth. Just as there are blind, stupid atheists.
I, personally, want to smack every atheist across the face who wants to take 'God' out of things we've been doing for generations. The American Pledge, for example. Currency. Schools. Etc. While I do not willingly say any of these, I do so because we are the minority. We ultimately do not have to say what we do not want to say. And every time I hear someone spouting about God in public, I like to spout off just as loudly about how ludicrous the aspect of God truly is.
Ultimately, a lot of atheists, or agnostics, will be of those who were not brought up by their parents, or forced into, in a religious manner. Could we be converted? Of course. Could I be converted? No. I like the aspect of religion supporting good morals and brotherhood, but nothing beyond that interests me. The Book of Revelations will always make me look at all religions involving Jesus Christ, God, and the rest of the Christian Pantheon to be intolerable, unjustified works of fiction to support a religious dogma.
Anything that suggests global unification is a sign of 'The End Times' is nothing more than a work of pure evil, or pure stupidity. Funny, really, how the same series of books will spout off about peace on earth and loving everyone, but wooo if we try to join as one we fukkin dead.
The Bible(s) is too full of contradictions within itself, and this is supposed to be the door that leads me to the path of accepting God and Jesus? No thanks. Boo is the one Supreme Being.
I, personally, want to smack every atheist across the face who wants to take 'God' out of things we've been doing for generations. The American Pledge, for example. Currency.
Those two things, at least, were products of anti-communist sentiment in the years after World War II. "In God We Trust" appeared on some coins in the post-Civil War era, but it wasn't adopted as the motto until 1956. "Under God" was purportedly first uttered by Lincoln in the Gettysburg address, but it wasn't added to the pledge until 1954 after much activism.
Demographics notwithstanding, religious references really have no place in public institutions, and this position is affirmed by the first amendment. Of course, the U.S. Constitution hasn't meant much since shortly after it was adopted, so it isn't surprising that we have a national pledge and motto that invoke the most popular deity.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain — that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." -Lysander Spooner
Hey, Rory.
I don't accept the existence of any gods, because there's no evidence that any gods exist.
Of course, this raises the issue of what evidence of a god might look like. I don't know, honestly, because I've never seen any. A number of religious apologists have put forth arguments and what they purport to be "evidence" for a particular deity, but I've yet to find any of it compelling. Many of the popular theistic arguments (e.g. the cosmological argument, the ontological argument, the teleological argument, etc.) are fraught with special pleading and other fallacies.
I can understand belief in a deity from incredulity, because that is the position I used to hold, but that reason isn't logical and no longer convinces me that such a belief is necessary or correct. Similarly, while I cannot refute the claimed subjective experiences of others in terms of allegedly interacting with gods or undergoing "spiritual" events, I can neither positively differentiate these claims from the subject's imagination (which is a theme I carry over to many other areas, as you might have noticed in some of my replies to doomsayers).
I have other reasons, which are ancillary to the simple lack of evidence, but they are philosophical and probably boring as hell (pun intended). This can be a long, complicated subject that I prefer to not to explore in depth here, mainly because this is a multi-faceted board, and I don't wish to offend anyone more than I have already. So I'll stop with this short, relatively uncomplicated response to your OP.