A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

Summary:

then he turns out to be a 2012er

A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

CaneLaz 17 Dec 2010 20:06

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/48530-solar-activity-vs-seismic-activity/

I found it interesting. You don't find out he's a 2012er until the end. Looks to be using Hancock and Geryl ideas.

Re: A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

obaeyens 18 Dec 2010 00:54

This guy is disguising his 2012 claim in so called science which is BS for someone actually know physics.

If I find time then I want to analyse this.

Re: A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

obaeyens 18 Dec 2010 01:10

MARS»» NO MAGNETIC FIELD (LOW)»» TECTONICALLY INACTIVE (LOW)
EARTH»» MAGNETIC FIELD»» TECTONICALLY ACTIVE

This is epic bad science.

So, because Mars has no magnetic field and no tectonic al activity and Earth has a magnetic field and is pretty tectonic active that proves that magnetic fields is the cause? wahahah

What about the fact that Mars has no Atmosphere and Earth has one.
What about the fact that Mars is smaller than Earth?
What about the fact that Mars is further away from the sun than Earth?
What bout the fact that Mars is red and Earth is not?
What about the fact that Mars ha no birds and Earth has birds.

See I just proven that birds causes earth quakes!
I could even prove that a rerun of the Charmed series causes Earth quakes since on Mars The series of Charmed never go a rerun and this no earth quakes!

Re: A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

obaeyens 18 Dec 2010 01:30

(-P)+[Q= MS(T+P)] where

P= energy of the sun (kj)
Q= energy of the magnetic shield (kj)
M= mass of the inner core
S= velocity of the speed of rotation of the planet
T= initial energy of Earth's core

I see a lot of hype words strung together making it appear that it is an intelligent created formula but basically means nothing.
This is what in Star Trek is called technobable, It appears intelligent and logical but it is completely senseless.

First of all he stays away from giving real numbers. 2012 hoaxers always avoid giving real numbers because it debunk their theory immediately.
His equal sign is in the complete wrong place!

(-P)+[Q= MS(T+P)]

Is in reality:
Q= MS(T+P)
(-P)+[Q]

What does (-P)+[Q] even mean?
(-P)+[Q] = 0?
(-P)+[Q] = 42?
(-P)+[Q] = The weight of an ant?
(-P)+[Q] = The number of days I have to work until I am on pension?

Re: A fringe science guy proposes a thesis

obaeyens 18 Dec 2010 01:41

Hiss drawing contains this explanation:

Previous alignments, the gravitational force of attraction of the galactic core was diminished due to the gas giants being caught by this force. Thus when this force caught the gas giants, the gravitational force of attraction was not as strong. It was strong enough to cause abnormal solar activity, thus causing earthquakes and periods of heating and cooling trends, and polar shifts. However this galactic alignment is significant because there is no other mass diminishing the full force of attraction.

He clearly has nu clue about gravity at all.
A gas giant between the galaxy core and Earth will not block gravity magically from having an effect on the solar system!
People don't magically start to float because during a solar eclipse the moon is blocking the gravity of the sun. Gravity field goes through masses and reaches the other there is nothing that can block gravity.
Also the gravity of the galactic core acts equally on all planets and Sun at the same time. We get all pulled equally so there is zero effect on our complete solar system even if the galaxy come would become 1 billion times stronger overnight.
And of course he ignores the fact that this alignment happens every year :-)

Tony (guest) 18 Dec 2010 02:53

Actually I don't think he is ignoring the fact that it happens every year….if i'm reading correctly. I think his argument is that in previous years, there have been gas giants shielding the sun from the black hole, where as in 2012 its not the case (his words not mine). I'm not sure how that adds up when you look at planetary positions.

But you are right, you can't block gravity. You don't stay up in the air when you're skydiving if you put a board between you and the Earth. You fall no matter what…and the friction you get is the air pushing on you, if you're wondering.

obaeyens 18 Dec 2010 11:55

Even if somehow a gas giant could block gravity, no gas giant can shield you from the galactic core gravitationally since even the biggest gas giant would be a tiny speck. His drawing of a gas giant and the sun is way out of proportion than reality.

And he is also ignoring that the Sun itself is a gas giant bigger than his gas giant!