Tectonics
This has a lot of interesting topics in it that bear relation to 2012 issues
Tectonics
Forum
» Off Topic / Off Topic
» Tectonics
Summary:
Scientists discuss tectonics
Justify this topic or it going bye-bye.
just looking for relevant stuff that is scaring me one second…..
Moved to Off-Topic.
Ivan Protocol pending.
There were two large cmes just prior to the japanese earthquake and it also states that moon was closest to the earth on the fatal day. They go on to discuss in various issues (can i say?) the relationship between solar cycles and earthquake frequency. they are all scientists and appear to know what theyu are talking about. They also have other articles relating to these subjects. it would really help me if someone could have a look and outline IF these claims are true or not.
There were two large cmes just prior to the japanese earthquake
There have been numerous CMEs this year.
and it also states that moon was closest to the earth on the fatal day.
And that would be patently wrong, as we have discussed elsewhere.
They go on to discuss in various issues (can i say?) the relationship between solar cycles and earthquake frequency.
Interesting, since there is no known relationship.
they are all scientists and appear to know what theyu are talking about.
Then you shouldn't have any trouble presenting their peer-reviewed papers. Hmm, deja vu.
They also have other articles relating to these subjects. it would really help me if someone could have a look and outline IF these claims are true or not.
You aren't here for help. Cut the act.
Numberhunter;
I am very confused by your behavior.
You first posted a section of text from a publication, then asked me to remove the entire thread, despite the fact that the section was probably 'fair use' as Bikenbeer2000 pointed out, because your family friend was upset that you were discussing it here.
You've re-posted several links to the NCGT website, and have been told in no uncertain terms that (with the possible exception of an off-hand mention in one article) that it does not relate to the topic of this website.
You keep opening new threads on these topics, and have recently adopted a rather taunting attitude toward the operators of this website.
This site isn't about tectonics, nor is it about alternate theories thereof. It is not about 'spirituality', or the non-medical use of the hallucinogenic herb Datura.
At this point, you've begun to piss off the admins and moderators. I suggest that you should quickly come to the point in your discussions, and ask specific questions that are related to the 2012 doomsday hoax. The only specific questions from you that I have seen that are marginally topical are whether earthquakes are related to moon phases (which we discuss on our earthquakes page), and whether a quote of Michael Ghil from a 2004 New Scientist article is accurate (which I don't know, because I don't have a subscription to New Scientist).
If you wish to post here, you are welcome to do so, provided that you follow the rules, and stay on topic. This isn't your soapbox.
"Do you ever think about things you do think about?" - Henry Drummond to Matthew Harrison Brady in Inherit the Wind
/forum/t-362757/tectonics#post-