Hey

Hey

rand45 05 Oct 2011 02:13

Is the rationalwiki a good source for debunking these end of the world claims and conspiracy theory stuff.

Re: Hey

TheGreatJuju 05 Oct 2011 05:36

RationalWiki is meant to take a skeptical stance and doesn't even pretend to be an unbiased resource. That said, most of the information there is good.

---

"They tell you, but do you believe it? If so, why?"

http://www.undeadrufus.com

Re: Hey

bikenbeer2000 05 Oct 2011 10:59

Their debunking of Nancy Lieder is quite amusing.
Their takes on the whole 2012 movement and the History Channel are also well worth reading.

Re: Hey

NighthawkNZ 05 Oct 2011 03:06

Is the rationalwiki a good source for debunking these end of the world claims and conspiracy theory stuff.

Well the quick browse I did they don't use much to back up their claims that it is all rubbish. (but it seems ok, I haven't had a thorough read of it to be honest)

At least 2012hoax.org are using a bit of science to back their claims of when debunking.

---

I see stupid people…

Re: Hey

OhNoZOMBIES 05 Oct 2011 05:02

It depends on the topic, but yes it is a good source. They always bak up their articles with legit sources.

rand45 (guest) 06 Oct 2011 02:12

good i ll just try to go there for all my religious problems from now on since i cant go here anymore for the religious claims and such