From about the time I was 9, I was an avid watcher of the History Channel. From its documentaries on the past, to its……well…other documentaries on the past, I was hooked. But when I started to get older, I noticed a shift in the emphasis of its programming. It started to change from focusing on the lessons of the past, and their applications in the future, to what could only be called, tentatively at that, more theoretical and abstract concepts. A prime example that drove me up the wall, because of what I can now articulate as large leaps in assumptionary logic, was and to this day is Ancient Aliens. The posing of a question that, while on paper may seem innocent, is in reality posed in a manner that suggests the answer that the creator of such a program already has seemed to be the methodology of the show, and it never sat well with me, these fallacies in logic were anathema to me, as at the time, I was discovering my own love of logic and interest in debate and the examination of statements. As the shift in programming became more complete, I can clearly say that there is little I recognize about the History Channel as it is today, when I compare it to what I admit, sparked my interest in the past. That having been said, I will also openly admit that this shift also sparked my skepticism; as I remembered the lessons about thinking for one's self and the dangers of blind obediance to authority (Nazi Germany and Stalin ring any bells?), I began to question what the man in the suit on the screen was saying. "Why should I assume that aliens must have built the pyramids, seeing as you don't think that humans had the capability?" Though I couldn't articulate them at the time, these questions amd concerns regarding logic distressed me, and I got the notion into my head that well, if one authority (and I now cringe when using that word regarding anything on the History Channel, given the incredible gaps in logic it now perpetuates) can be wrong, why can't another? These feelings, while unarticulate, birthed what would become the dominate characterization of what I identify as myself today. A sceptic, and a lover of logic.
I'm an aspiring philosophy major, and the 2012hoax sparked my inner skeptic.






