I can't believe this but after a year I stop believing in December 21st, 2012 and now after Dick Clark died I fell into reading such things like people now believing in it because of Dick Clark death. I know it's stupid but this is how I'm feeling and I just want to not believe again.
This won't be the first New Year's Eve that Dick Clark will be absent from. Clark was unable to host the 2004/05 New Year's Eve celebration because of a stroke he had so Regis filled in for him. Dick Clark will certainly be missed but that is not a sign that there won't be a New Year's Eve.
The simple minded and the uninformed can be easily led astray and those that cannot connect the dots, hey look the other way. People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all ~ John Mellencamp
Dick Clark was an 82-year-old stroke victim. The fact that he remained alive and functional so long was far more remarkable than his [unsurprising and inevitable] death. What exactly do you think this is a "sign" of? The world doesn't hinge on whether a decades-running entertainment personality is dead or alive.
When I first heard that one, it was posted as a joke, in very poor taste certainly, but a joke nonetheless.
I can't believe that there is anyone who would actually believe that because Dick Clark died, we wouldn't have New Year's Eve. What about all those we had before he started hosting the celebration?
When we started this, I never dreamed we would be answering such utterly preposterous questions.
Silly me, I thought it would be questions about things that, even though they're not true, might sound to some gullible people as if they could be.
I first saw this posted on our Facebook page and like Alene, I found it to be in poor taste. But it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see the doomsday brigade treating it as a serious claim. It just shows how desperate they are becoming.






