it can not be proven scientific wrong like the other stuff can…
Except that I've just shown how it's insignificant…
In order to be 'scientifically wrong' it must have a testable claim. The testable claim is 'the date 11/11/11 will be significant to the Planet'. The test is to go back through the history books and find out what happened. Last I checked, November 11th 2011 was more or less identical to November 10th and November 12th.
So, by simply looking at history we find that the date was not significant. It might have looked prettier on the page than 11/12/11, but it was no different.
The time, 11:11, is even easier to show to be insignificant. I've been alive for nearly 9000 days, each of which has had an 11:11 on the clock (or two, if you don't use 24 hour clocks). So how many of the 18000 11:11s I've lived through been significant? Well, I can't be sure, I didn't check them all. Maybe I lost a tooth at that time, or tripped, or failed a test, but those instances will have occurred far, far fewer times than the number of 11:11s where nothing interesting happened at all.
As I said, you make a number significant, not the number itself. If you think it means something, it means something. It doesn't mean the exact same thing to every single person on the world. To the vast majority of people, it's just a number, it's just a time, it's just a date. That's it.