The guardian express said in their newspaper that here was unusual volcanic activity and earthquakes in the California fault.
You don't even know what you're talking about. What volcanic activity? there is no volcanic activity. Not in this part of the pacific rim of fire. Where do you get this nonsense from?
http :// earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/map/
World is pretty calm. There were two or three aftershocks, and that's pretty much it in California.
Volcanic activity? Do you even know what kind of fault lines are around California? Strike-slip. Not subduction faults or a plate collision. The plates are sliding against each other.
Meh i'm smelling trolls.
Yep.
Cal = Setting sun.
I've already checked Guardian Express. Nothing there.
There are very few reporters talking about the end. Not all the reporters.
Horrible trolls. Check the facts!
There is no unusual earthquake or volcanic activity going on. We have about 1.3 million quakes per year worldwide. In the 6-6.9 range, there are about 134 per year. As for volcanos, there are about 20 volcanos erupting at any given time worldwide. The Guardian Express is practically the online equivalent of a supermarket tabloid.
Not sure what you're talking about. Absolutely no unusual activity in California.
you in cali are on an ACTIVE fault known as the san andreas fault, why is some earthquakes and volcanos unusual there? Theres volcanos in cali because the pacific plate is sliding under the north american plate, melting into magma which rises and forms volcanoes all on the east coast. Theres nothing unusual about that.
I've noticed they have a lot of stories about doomsday today and all the reporters are fearing the end.
I am unfamiliar with this publication
Is it another weekly world news ?
Which reporters? All the reporters? Which? Name them.
And what articles? I see "doomsday" barely mentioned. And some just mocking the hoax.
No reporter in finland has put any doomsdy story except when they are debunking it
the guardian express had alot of stories today about the signs in the world. A scinentist explained that if there was more than 39 big earthquakes on the erath in just two days that was a sign that something was very wrong. And there hade ben 29 earthquakes in ONE DAY. he also said that from 2004 there hade been alot of earthquakes where there should have been none. They wrote that the planetery alligment caused this and that the earths crust was cracking…..
im very scared yet again.
WRONGGGGG.
There are over 150 quakes a week in California alone on average since records have been kept.
Activity hasn't increased nor declined. CHECK THE WEBSITE I POSTED.
The guardian express is garbage.
And planetary alignment didn't cause anything because it has no affect.
http :// earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/map/ - The world is very calm. Check the FACTS.
is there an planetary alignment now? i tought that was just a hoax??
Yes. There is no planetary alignment now. And even if there was it would have no effect.
Please check the USGS website I provided. The earth is actually quite calm.
Do you even know how many quakes there are per day?
Hundreds, daily, if not thousands.
According to your logic, then, and that of the nameless, faceless "scinentist" you cited, something has been "wrong" with the Earth for a long time.
he had a name and was working at some university, i just wrote a little of what i read at that sight. why would i scinentst say things like that if they are wrong? thats pure evil. just go in to guardian express and read, the have alot of articels about the end of the world today. so mean and i wish i never read it.
It's total nonsense. And that scientists isn't real and is probably fake. Guardian Express is garbage. There are better publications out there. There was one article from an OP/ED… making all these assumptions. Welcome to planet earth… earthquakes have been happening for as long as the planet has been here… same thing with volcanoes erupting. Do you even realize how many earthquakes happen every week in California? 150. IT hasn't increased or declined. Activity is always going to happen.
http : / / guardianlv . com / 2012 / 12 /greminid- meteror- shower- comes- as - the - earth - is - experiencing- unusual - earthquakes - and - volcanic - activity /
okay, this was what i read. they say they have follow the earthquakes over 3 months and it does not look god.
It's a sensationalist garbage article.
Activity has not increased or declined. This is proven fact.
The pacific rim of fire has always been having activity and it hasn't increased. Check with the USGS website I posted and look at records.
i checked your website, but looking at it it looks like its a new earth quake every hour and its filled with spots all over the map. i guess this is normal but i cant see the: "it looks very calm" argument, since i dont know how it is supposed to be read. how do i see if there is alot of earthquakes? and how do I know if its calm?
Check the records on the USGS website. That's how the earth always is. There are hundreds if not thousands of earthquakes throughout the world every week and that's how it always is. Somebody with more knowledge than me on tectonic plates can discuss it more. In contrast, the earth hasn't experienced a huge earthquake in quite some time. Earthquakes 5.0-6.0 are not necessarily big earthquakes. The one off California was minimal and didn't even cause a tsunami. I can say 2004 was probably more seismically active than this year.
And there was only one earthquake off California (with minor aftershocks). Not a second 6.1.
Among the years 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2011,2012
2012 stands in the SECOND LEAST QUAKES position.
. Demoralize the enemy from within by surprise, terror, sabotage, assassination. This is the war of the future.”
Thank you.
The 1960s and 1970s actually had a bit more earthquake activity. The most violent earthquake ever recorded was in 1960 Chile (9.5). Did the world end then? No. Overall activity has been pretty consistent since records have been kept however.
ok, i think they are trying to tell us that NOW when its 7 days left, the earth will increase in earthquakes.
And why would it do that when May 21st is just another day?
Even the articles from the Guardian said they don't believe in the May 21st prediction.
why would a scientist say things like that if they're wrong?
Oh, well, gee, I really don't know, maybe it's because they're interested in profiting off of the fear of others assuming they don't know better, because they're goddamn cranks?
We discuss crank scientists here, and clearly you're not up to speed. Were you around at all, just casually viewing, when all the hullaballoo about Elenin and "Doctor" Mensur Omerbashich's ill-informed papers on meaningless alignments surfaced?
And just to enlighten you, in over a decade, 2012 has been the second-least active year for earthquakes ever recorded, with only 2009 beating it out on inactivity. It's nobody's fault but your own if you choose to believe sensationalist, baseless hokum.
A scinentist explained that if there was more than 39 big earthquakes on the erath in just two days that was a sign that something was very wrong. And there hade ben 29 earthquakes in ONE DAY.
Good lord. We have about that or more per day EVERY DAY since forever!!! If we stopped having earthquakes altogether, that would be a sign there was something wrong.
A lie can travel half way around the world before the truth can get its boots on.
Where is this coming from then the guardian express seems to be the only ones reporting it
There is YOUR problem. It's nonsense.
Thanks
Just a question about the planetary posision. How much does planets move? I mean are there actually a big different between their position on the 19th or the 21th? the cant move that fast can they? haha just a question. So from now the 15th of december untill 21 how different will the solar system look?
I cannot believe that I spent my morning checking up on this paper, but here you go. First of all, the paper is an online publication owned by a man who lets people with no journalist experience write articles. I also did some fact checking about this article to see what the author was on about.
1. The scientists being caught of guard may refer to the 21 Nov volcano eruption in NZ….and there was no previous warning that it was going to erupt as the stations that monitor that volcano didn't see an uptick in activity.
The author of both of those articles - is also misleading b/c the reference to the scientist was written back in April and is now trying to bring more current activity to fit his needs.
Gheorghe Marmureanu is the name of that scientist and he was quoted as saying that something is wrong if you have 39 earthquakes, but I cannot seem to find anything posted in main stream media.
I will keep looking, but as far as this publication goes - I would take it with a grain of salt. Even the owner seems to be a little pro-doomie.
Gheorghe Marmureanu is the name of that scientist
His name has come up before. He has the relevant qualifications but he's gone somewhat off the rails and 'crank scientist' would be a more accurate description nowadays.
and he was quoted as saying that something is wrong if you have 39 earthquakes
This was in April at the time of the two magnitude 8 earthquakes and the 39 were aftershocks, so not unusual at all.
This is going to sound stupid but do you think since there is less this year and than all the other years one big one could hit on the 21st? Just covering my basics here.
The earth doesn't operate like that. Its not like the earth is going to hold back on all of the smaller quakes to save up for a huge quake. Many have posted the USGS info on this site time and time again. Every year is a different year. There have been years that have had less quakes than this year, but based on the past few years, the number of quakes is down. You have nothing to worry about. Earthquakes, volcanoes are all signs that our planet is healthy and functioning the way its supposed to. Its the deal, we occupy and reside on an active planet, and there is no way around that.
Im not expert but i think there is no specific reason that there must be big earthquake every year. This year just have been calm. Also if there were big earthquake to hit 21st the world wouldn't end. One earthquake can't wipeout whole human race.
Thanks for clearing it up. Figured I wanted to get someone to clear it, I'm sure a dooms person will have pull that one out sooner or later.