This site has also very good information about astronomy.
Not sure if "exposing" is the right word. I thought it was more of finding another site that shares our view - awesome. Perhaps they could be invited to help us evolve this site into a larger doomsday debunker website.
Perhaps they could be invited to help us evolve this site into a larger doomsday debunker website.
"They" is actually "him", one dude (Stuart Robbins). He has posted on the forums at least once, so he is aware of this site.
One's convictions should be proportional to one's evidence. - Sam Harris
Not sure if "exposing" is the right word.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Not sure I want the likes of Nancy Lieder exposing herself to me.
Stuart has been invited to participate in the new site. I am not sure if he will or not, based on his schedule and our different approaches (we are much more up in the face of doomsayers than he is) but we will see.
"Do you ever think about things you do think about?" - Henry Drummond to Matthew Harrison Brady in Inherit the Wind
Thought I'd reply personally. First, the name — "Exposing PseudoAstronomy." It may not be that catchy, but it was what I came up with given that "Bad Astronomy" was taken.
Second, the new site — I will participate and contribute within the constraints of my work and other projects. I'm happy to help, but before I spread myself even more thinly, I have to take care of my other commitments, and, for example, starting next week I'm going back to 4 podcast episodes per month rather than just 2.
I am a really big fan of your podcasts! And I like the name: "Exposing PseudoAstronomy."
It is a different way than this site to expose the 2012 hoax, because you use audio clips.
Having multiple different media is good, it covers all angles.